Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
About Article
Analyze Data
Archive
Best Practices
Better Outputs
Blog
Code Optimization
Code Quality
Command Line
Daily tips
Dashboard
Data Analysis & Manipulation
Data Engineer
Data Visualization
DataFrame
Delta Lake
DevOps
DuckDB
Environment Management
Feature Engineer
Git
Jupyter Notebook
LLM
LLM
Machine Learning
Machine Learning
Machine Learning & AI
Manage Data
MLOps
Natural Language Processing
NumPy
Pandas
Polars
PySpark
Python Tips
Python Utilities
Python Utilities
Scrape Data
SQL
Testing
Time Series
Tools
Visualization
Visualization & Reporting
Workflow & Automation
Workflow Automation

Pandas vs Polars: Harness Parallelism for Faster Data Processing

Table of Contents

Pandas vs Polars: Harness Parallelism for Faster Data Processing

Pandas is a single-threaded library, utilizing only a single CPU core. To achieve parallelism with Pandas, you would need to use additional libraries like Dask.

import pandas as pd
import multiprocessing as mp
import dask.dataframe as dd


df = pd.DataFrame({"A": range(1_000_000), "B": range(1_000_000)})

# Perform the groupby and sum operation in parallel 
ddf = dd.from_pandas(df, npartitions=mp.cpu_count())
result = ddf.groupby("A").sum().compute()

Polars, on the other hand, automatically leverages the available CPU cores without any additional configuration.

import polars as pl

df = pl.DataFrame({"A": range(1_000_000), "B": range(1_000_000)})

# Perform the groupby and sum operation in parallel 
result = df.group_by("A").sum()

Link to Polars.

Interact with this code in Google Colab.

Want the full walkthrough?

Check out our in-depth guide on Polars vs Pandas: A Fast, Multi-Core Alternative for DataFrames

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is empty
    Scroll to Top

    Work with Khuyen Tran

    Work with Khuyen Tran